REGULATORY POLICY EFFECTIVENESS IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY: THE CASE OF THE ANIMAL FEED MANUFACTURING SECTOR
Main Article Content
Abstract
Vietnam has the highest animal feed output in Southeast Asia, with an annual growth rate of 10-15%. However, in addition to potential for businesses and consumers, the situation in Vietnam demonstrates that there are still significant constraints in the administration of the animal feed industry. As a result, the current condition and variables influencing state management of the animal feed business in Vietnam are examined in this paper. Data were collected from 450 surveys and analyzed by using the SEM model and SPSS22 software. According to the findings, the three most important elements influencing State management efficiency are (i) human resources, (ii) investment, and (iii) infrastructure and equipment. Based on the findings of the study, several recommendations are made to increase the effectiveness of state management in the animal feed production business, thereby contributing to sustainable development.
Keywords
Animal feed State management Food manufacturing industry SEM Vietnam, Animal feed, State management, Food manufacturing industry, SEM, Vietnam
Article Details
References
2. Cục chăn nuôi Bộ NN và PTNT “Tác động của TPP và hội nhập kinh tế tới ngành chăn nuôi VN” 16/10/2015. Website của Chăn nuôi Việt Nam. Retrived from: http://channuoivietnam.com/thong-ke-chan-nuoi/tk-thong-ke-chung/.
3. Cục khuyến nông bộ NNPTNT 2003. “Khái quát về tình hình chăn nuôi và thị trường thức ăn gia súc VN”.
4. Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). Industrial policy and development: The political economy of capabilities accumulation. New York: Oxford, 113-137.
5. Nguyễn Tiệp (2002). Giáo trình nguồn nhân lực, Nhà xuất bản Lao Động.
6. Nguyễn Đức Trọng (2023), Thực Trạng Và Định Hướng Công Tác Nghiên Cứu Khoa Học Ngành Chăn Nuôi, Tạp chí Khoa học Công nghệ Chăn nuôi - Số 137.
7. Nunnally, J. C. (1994). và Bernstein. IH the Assessment of Reliability, Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.
8. Ostrom E. Reflections on some Unsettled Problems of Irrigation. Am. Econ. Rev. 2011;101:49–63. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.1.49.
9. Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Journal of consumer research, 21(2), 381-391.
10. Tổng cục thống kê (2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021). Niên giám thống kê Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Thống kê. Website của Tổng cục Thống kê. Retrived from: https://www.gso.gov.vn/so-lieu-thong-ke/.
11. van Meijl, H., Van Rheenen, T., Tabeau, A., & Eickhout, B. (2006). The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(1), 21-38.
12. Wu, Q., Guan, X., Zhang, J., & Xu, Y. (2019). The role of rural infrastructure in reducing production costs and promoting resource-conserving agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3493.
13. World Bank. World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 1994. Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/687361468340136928/pdf/13483.pdf.